For companies

See who’s using AI well and what changes after training

For L&D, HR and AI transformation leads

You've rolled out AI tools and training, but you can't tell who's using them well, or whether the training changed anything. Answerr measures how your people actually work with AI, team by team and shows what changes after training.

  • A baseline by team and roleSee where AI skill is strong, where it's thin and which dimension is holding each team back.
  • Training aimed where it's neededSpend your budget on the teams and skills with the biggest gaps.
  • Results you can show leadershipMeasure again after training and report the change in the same scores.
AI skill by departmentMeridian Group · average AIQ™
Before training (Q2)After training (Q4)
Finance71 →78+7
Customer Success67 →74+7
Product71 →75+4
Sales64 →73+9
Biggest remaining gap: Critical thinking in Sales. People still accept the AI's figures without checking the source.
For universities

See how students learn with AI and help them prove it

For faculty, deans and career services

Students use AI in almost every assignment and faculty can't see whether they're thinking with it or copying from it. Answerr shows how students actually work with AI, so you can design better courses and give graduates something employers trust.

  • Insight to redesign assignmentsSee where students accept AI output without checking it and build courses that close that gap.
  • Progress across a semesterTrack how a cohort's AI skill changes from the first week to the last.
  • A credential students ownGraduates earn a verified AIQ™ credential they choose when and where to share.
Course cohortStrategy with AI · 312 students
Week 2Week 14
Critical thinking52 →68
Questioning58 →66
Reasoning61 →70
Adaptability63 →69
Judgment55 →67
For faculty: In week 2, most students used AI-generated sources without checking them. By week 14, most verified first.
186 students earned a verified AIQ™ credential
Sample data · illustrative course
Between AI capability assessments

Set the baseline once. Then keep measuring, continuously.

An AI capability assessment shows where people stand on one day. The Answerr browser extension measures how they work with AI over time and offers guidance as they go. You can see where they’re improving and where they still need support. The same cycle works for a sales team or a semester-long course.

Day 1Baseline AI capability assessment
Each quarterMeasure again and report the change
  • Measures continuouslyScores update from real daily work with AI, not just on the day of an AI capability assessment.
  • Coaches in the momentA short nudge when someone is about to rely on an AI answer without checking it.
  • Shows progress over timeMeasure the same dimensions over time to see where people improve and where gaps remain.

People see their own coaching. Managers and faculty see only what your privacy settings allow.

your AI assistant
Draft the Q3 variance note for the CFO.
Revenue came in 6.2% under plan, driven by mid-market churn. Shall I send it?
Answerr coach

That figure has no source. Ask where 6.2% came from before it reaches the CFO.

Critical thinking · counted toward your AIQ™
Your AIQ™ this month72

Built to develop people, not to judge them

For growth, not ranking

Results are meant to guide training and teaching, not performance reviews or grades.

You decide who sees what

Choose who can see individual results and who sees group averages.

Real work, not a quiz

People do tasks from their own role or course with an AI colleague, not a test about AI.

Not a personality test

No inference about intelligence, traits or demographics. Scores describe what happened in the task.